Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

 
Abstract
Regarding the importance of learning disorders, the interventions will be taken place to improve it, and is necessary to prevent the future problems.  The purpose of this study is to figure out the impact of metacognitive strategies on students’ learning performances with learning disorders in the studies that were done in the past by using meta-analysis patterns. This study determines the findings of different researches, the amount of the effect of meta-cognitive interventions by using meta-analysis and integrations. So, 9 researches were selected from 12 researches that were acceptable in terms of methodology, and meta-analysis was done on them. The research instrument was a meta-analysis checklist. The results showed that the average size of combined effect of meta-cognitive strategies was 0.82 on the students’ performance with learning disorders at the fixed model, and the average size of the combined effect was 0.81 at the random model that both of them are significant at the level of p < 0.05. So instructing metacognitive strategies bring about learning and academic performance in students with learning disorders. Since instructing metacognitive strategies can be effective for students have problems in cognitive process.

Keywords

Butler, D. L. (1998). Metacognition And Learning Disabilities. In B.Y.L. Wong(Ed.) Learning About Learning Disabilities (2nd Ed., PP. 277-307). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ellis, D. M. & Hudson, J. L. (2010). The Metacognitive Model of Generalized AnxietyDisorder in Children and Adolescents. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice,13(4), 151–163.
Garner, R. (1990). When Children And Adults Do Not Use Learning Strategies: Toward A Theory Of Settings. Review Of Educational Research, 60, 517-530.
Hamman, D., Berthelot, J. & Growley, J. E. (2000). Teachers' Coaching Of Learning And Its Relation To Students Strategic Learning. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 342-348.
Hartlep, K .L. & Forsyth, G .A. (2000). The Effect Of Self-Reference On Learning And Retention.Teaching Of Psychology, 27(4), 269-271.
Kaliski, L. (1967). Arithmetic And The Brain-Injured Children Edward Frierson And Walter Barbe (Eds.). Educating Children With Learning Disabilities, Selected Readings. N-Y: Appel-Century Croft, P. 458-466.
Kenji, R. & Bethlehem, U. (2002). Task Engagments & Mathematics Performance in Children with Attention-Defict Hyperactitvity Disorder: Effects of supplemental Computer Instruction. School Psychology & Quarterly, 17(3), 242-257.
King, A. (1991). Effects Of Training In Strategic Questioning On Children's Problem Solving Performance. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 83 (3), 307-317.
Korkman, M., & Hakkinen-Rihu, P. (1994). A new classification of deamong clinic-referred children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 18, 29-45.
Korkman, M., & Pesonen, A. E. (1994). A comparison of neuropsychological test profiles of children with attention deficit—hyperactivity disorder and/or learning disorder. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27(6), 383-392.
Livengston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: On Overview. Available On Internet.
Loper, A. B. (1980). Metacognitive development: Implications for cognitive training. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 1(1), 1-8.
Sen, H. S. (2009). The Relationsip Between The Use Of Metacognitive Strategies And Reading Comprehension. Procedia Social And Behavioral Sciences 1, 2301–2305.
Swanson, H. L., & Jerman, O. (2006). Math disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Review of educational Research, 76(2), 249-274.
Kaur, T., Kohli, T., & Devi, B. (2008). Impact of Various Instructional Strategies for Enhancing Mathematical Skills of Learning Disabled Children. Journal of Indian Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 4(1), 16-19.
Weinstein, C. E. & Hume, L. M. (1998). Study Strategies For Lifelong Learning. Washington D. American Psychological Association (APA).
Woolfolk, A. E. (2001). Educational Psychology. Boston; Allynan Bacon.